Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Handwriting activates broader brain networks than typing, study shows

by Eric W. Dolan
December 19, 2024
in Cognitive Science, Neuroimaging
Audrey van der Meer with a research subject.

Audrey van der Meer with a research subject.

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

While keyboards dominate modern classrooms, a new study in Frontiers in Psychology suggests handwriting may be irreplaceable when it comes to learning. Researchers found that writing by hand activates far more extensive and interconnected brain networks compared to typing, particularly in regions linked to memory and sensory processing. These findings provide new evidence that handwriting engages the brain in unique ways, raising concerns about the growing reliance on digital tools for education.

As digital tools replace traditional handwriting in classrooms, concerns have arisen about how this shift might impact learning. Typing on a keyboard is often preferred because it enables children to express themselves more quickly and with less physical strain. However, prior research has shown that handwriting is linked to better memory retention, letter recognition, and overall learning outcomes. The fine motor movements involved in handwriting seem to stimulate the brain differently than typing, but the exact neurological mechanisms behind this difference remained unclear.

To investigate, the researchers focused on brain connectivity, which describes how different brain regions work together to accomplish a task. By comparing brain activity during handwriting and typing, the team hoped to uncover whether the physical act of handwriting promotes more extensive brain communication patterns—patterns thought to support learning and memory formation.

“The brain research on handwriting is really a spin-off of our infant brain research in the NuLab, our developmental neuroscience laboratory at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), where we show that babies are born with a brain that is ready to learn from day one,” said study author Audrey van der Meer, a professor of neuropsychology.

For their new study, the researchers recruited 40 university students in their early twenties. To ensure consistency, only right-handed participants were included in the analysis, as determined by a standardized handedness assessment. After excluding participants whose data contained artifacts, the final sample consisted of 36 individuals.

Each participant completed two tasks: handwriting and typing. For the handwriting condition, participants used a digital pen to write visually presented words in cursive directly on a touchscreen. For the typing condition, participants typed the same words on a keyboard using only their right index finger. Participants wrote or typed each word repeatedly within a 25-second window while brain activity was recorded. To avoid visual distractions, the words did not appear on the screen during typing.

Brain electrical activity was measured using high-density electroencephalography (EEG), a method that captures rapid changes in brain activity using a net of sensors placed on the scalp. The researchers focused on connectivity, analyzing how strongly different brain regions communicated with each other while participants wrote or typed.

“In our previous studies, critics sometimes mentioned we had tested too few participants,” van der Meer told PsyPost. “This time, we recruited 40 young adults and were able to use the brain data from 36. This is a massive amount of data given that our EEG nets consist of 256 electrodes and can record data at up to 1,000 Hz.”

The results revealed striking differences in brain activity between handwriting and typing. Handwriting activated far more widespread and interconnected brain networks than typing, particularly in the theta (3.5–7.5 Hz) and alpha (8–12.5 Hz) frequency bands. These brain waves, particularly in the lower frequency range, are associated with memory formation, sensory processing, and attention.

The most significant connectivity patterns during handwriting emerged in central and parietal brain regions, which are involved in processing motor control, sensory input, and higher-order cognitive tasks. In contrast, typing produced far less synchronized activity across these areas, indicating that pressing keys involves far less integration of visual, motor, and sensory input than forming letters by hand.

The researchers proposed that handwriting’s benefits arise from the spatiotemporal complexity of the task. Handwriting requires precise coordination of vision, motor commands, and sensory feedback as the brain continuously adjusts finger and hand movements to shape each letter. Typing, on the other hand, relies on repetitive keystrokes that provide minimal motor variation or feedback.

“In our handwriting research, it becomes clear that the brain works differently when writing by hand as opposed to when typing on a keyboard,” van der Meer explained. “Precisely forming letters by hand requires fine motor skills and involves the body and senses to a much larger degree than typing on a keyboard does. As a result, handwriting involves most of the brain, requiring the brain to communicate fast and efficiently between its active parts.”

“Our latest results show widespread brain connectivity for handwriting but not for typewriting, suggesting that the spatiotemporal pattern from visual and proprioceptive information obtained through the precisely controlled hand movements when using a pen, contribute extensively to the brain’s connectivity patterns that promote learning.”

The study’s findings suggest that handwriting should remain an essential part of education, especially for young children whose brains are still developing. The researchers argue that handwriting’s ability to engage the brain more fully provides “optimal conditions for learning,” making it an important tool for fostering cognitive growth.

Rather than abandoning handwriting in favor of digital tools, the researchers recommend a balanced approach. While keyboards are useful for certain tasks, handwriting offers unique neurological benefits that cannot be replicated by typing alone. Schools, therefore, should prioritize handwriting instruction to ensure children develop the brain connectivity patterns that support lifelong learning.

“Our brain research shows that handwriting is very good brain stimulation—especially for the developing brain in young children,” van der Meer said. “Therefore, we propose a minimum of handwriting tuition for all children in the lower grades. Also, we see the ability to write by hand and to draw as an important part of our cultural heritage, and we think it is important that the next generation is able to write a poem or love letter by hand. Incidentally, based on our 2020 paper, 20 states in the United States decided to reintroduce handwriting instruction in schools.”

“We are sometimes accused of being against all digital development and wanting to go back to the stone age. All we are saying is that while it is vital to maintain handwriting practice at school, it is also important to keep up with continuously developing technological advances. Therefore, teachers and pupils alike should be aware of which practice has the best learning effect in what context, for example, when taking lecture notes or when writing an essay.”

While the study provides evidence that handwriting promotes more extensive brain connectivity, it does have limitations. The participants were young adults, so the findings may not generalize to children or older adults. Additionally, the study used digital handwriting, which may differ slightly from traditional pen-and-paper writing in terms of sensory input and motor control.

The researchers plan to address these limitations in future studies. For example, they are investigating whether students who take notes by hand learn more effectively than those who type. They also hope to explore whether older adults who practice handwriting regularly exhibit slower cognitive decline than those who rely exclusively on digital tools.

The study, “Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity: a high-density EEG study with implications for the classroom,” was authored by F. R. (Ruud) Van der Weel and Audrey L. H. Van der Meer.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin9ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Muscle contractions release chemical signals that promote brain network development
Memory

Sleep helps stitch memories into cognitive maps, according to new neuroscience breakthrough

June 28, 2025

Scientists have discovered that forming a mental map of a new environment takes more than just recognizing individual places—it also requires sleep. The study highlights how weakly tuned neurons gradually become synchronized to encode space as a connected whole.

Read moreDetails
Regular psychedelic users exhibit different brain responses to self-related thoughts, study finds
Neuroimaging

Regular psychedelic users exhibit different brain responses to self-related thoughts, study finds

June 28, 2025

A new study suggests that regular users of psychedelics may process self-related thoughts differently at both psychological and brain levels, revealing altered patterns of brain activity during self-reflection compared to non-users who intend to try psychedelics.

Read moreDetails
Reduced pineal gland volume observed in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder
Cognitive Science

Neuroscientists identify key gatekeeper of human consciousness

June 27, 2025

Using rare brain recordings from patients, scientists found that the thalamus helps trigger visual awareness. The study reveals that this deep brain region sends synchronized signals to the cortex, acting as a gateway for conscious perception.

Read moreDetails
Neuroscientists identify a reversible biological mechanism behind drug-induced cognitive deficits
Depression

New study links intermittent fasting to improved mood via brain’s dopamine system

June 27, 2025

A new study suggests that intermittent fasting may reduce symptoms of depression by activating dopamine D1 receptors in the brain’s prefrontal cortex. The findings point to a potential non-drug approach for mood disorders rooted in brain signaling.

Read moreDetails
How people end romantic relationships: New study pinpoints three common break up strategies
Autism

Brain connectivity shift across puberty may explain autism risk in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

June 26, 2025

Scientists have uncovered how puberty reshapes brain connectivity in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, a genetic condition linked to autism and schizophrenia. The findings highlight how changes in synapses and brain connections may shape social behavior and mental health outcomes later in life.

Read moreDetails
Girls as young as 8 show cognitive sensitivity to their own body weight, new study finds
Body Image and Body Dysmorphia

Girls as young as 8 show cognitive sensitivity to their own body weight, new study finds

June 25, 2025

Girls as young as eight show a unique sensitivity to numbers representing their body weight, a new study finds. The results highlight early gender differences in attention and raise questions about how body awareness develops and affects girls’ perceptions later in life.

Read moreDetails
Schoolchildren in classrooms where trees can be seen are less prone to aggression, defiance, and rule-breaking
Cognitive Science

Critical thinking and academic achievement reinforce each other over time, study finds

June 24, 2025

A new study has found that critical thinking and academic achievement build on each other over time in elementary school students, highlighting the importance of integrating thinking skills into classroom learning to support long-term educational growth.

Read moreDetails
Chronic stress can alter genetic material in sperm, leading to changes in offspring behavior
Mental Health

A common parasite not only invades the brain — it can also decapitate human sperm

June 22, 2025

A new study finds that a widespread parasite, Toxoplasma gondii, can physically damage human sperm, including decapitating them on contact. The findings raise fresh questions about the parasite’s potential role in the decades-long global decline in male fertility.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Sleep helps stitch memories into cognitive maps, according to new neuroscience breakthrough

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds

Openness to sugar relationships tied to short-term mating, not life history strategy

Regular psychedelic users exhibit different brain responses to self-related thoughts, study finds

New psychology research uncovers surprisingly consistent misjudgments of tattooed individuals

Neuroscientists identify key gatekeeper of human consciousness

New study links intermittent fasting to improved mood via brain’s dopamine system

Ashwagandha extract boosts memory and cognition in people with mild cognitive impairment, study finds

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy